Terrorism and Protest. It’s All Relative, Depending on the Colour of Your Skin.

If, suddenly, legalism is a thing and there is a necessity to comply with legal and linguistic definition, I say “Rest in Peace, Ms. Heather Heyer. I salute you for the martyr you have sadly become.”

Advertisements
Who’d have thought that we live in a world where there is a fine line between protest and terrorism? The colour of your skin deciding what side of the fence you fall on.
 
If you are of Arabic descent and drive a vehicle through a crowd, you are a terrorist, you are a murderer, you have no place in human society. A coward, breeding hate. And this is before anyone has even taken time to find out what your name is.
If you are white and drive a vehicle through a crowd, we need to take time to gather the facts. Then we find out that you aren’t an animal but, rather, a 20 year old from Ohio. The people that know you can’t believe you could do a thing like this and, if you have a track record of hate, you’re a lone wolf. You couldn’t possibly represent your race or any systemic injustice.
104651126-RTS1BI70.720x405
 
If you’re black and you turn up to protest with a flaming torch and/or semi-automatic rifle, dressed in full combat clothing…. Oh, actually, wait…. That hasn’t happened. Tamir Rice, though, can probably give us the low-down on what can happen if you’re black and carry a weapon. Or, at least, what can happen if you’re 12 and carry a toy gun. He’s dead, though. Some would say, killed by the very system that allows others to exercise a right to carry a weapon in protest. Some very real ones.
 
If you’re black and cause a riot when you protest, you’re a thug and an animal. You are sub-human and your reasons for protest should all be handled, in love, by sitting down and talking.
If you’re white and cause a riot when you protest, you’re exercising a right. All voices should be equal. The country is a country of free speech and, therefore, the carrying of torches, rifles, banners and shields of hate form part of a relevant voice that should be heard. The violence comes from a firm foundation of belief and, as such, should be heard.
 
What does our leadership think of this?
 
Our leadership kept its thoughts to 140 characters or less so that the emotion of someone being murdered, by someone driving through a crowd, could fit within a Twitter feed. When it appeared to speak personally, there was a lack of passion and a loss of words in condemning evil acts. You know. The passion that exists and rhetoric that flows, oh so smoothly, when fists are shaken at countries where the population doesn’t know much outside their own borders. Fists shaken at countries where farmers and shepherds look back and scratch their heads.
car-crashes-into-crowd-virginia
 
ABC News spoke of Mr. Fields’ “Alleged crime”. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said that the alleged crime “Does meet with the definition of domestic terrorism”. The U.S. Department of Justice is pursuing what Fields allegedly did “in every way that we can make a case.” – ABC News.
Pretty much, some sick Shakespearean-type word play that separates Mr. Fields from a crime and the crime from terrorism. Suddenly, blatant video evidence isn’t enough for us to form opinion. Maybe I’m supposed to believe that the brakes possibly failed on this vehicle?
14xp-heather-master315
 
If, suddenly, legalism is a thing and there is a necessity to comply with legal and linguistic definition, I say “Rest in Peace, Ms. Heather Heyer. I salute you for the martyr you have sadly become.”
ac88bd450b0c5312999b6d858008685b
 
As I look, confused and concerned, at the bottom of this tea cup, I see a German Shepherd, tethered in a garden, behind a garden fence. It barks but the kids outside the fence still play. They laugh, taunt and are thoroughly entertained.
Sadly, though, this is 2017. Loud barking seems to count for so much, allowing for so much potential damage, socially, economically. These tea leaves almost predict the end, I feel…
 
*sip*

BBC News: Steve Scalise shooting: The moment baseball gunman opens fire

I hope Steve Scalise pulls through from this. People really need to cool off.

I guess a question to ask of the media, though, is how the term ‘terrorism’ has reserved caveats for itself. We suddenly need to find out all the facts before the word is thrown out there when the term is clearly defined in most dictionaries and understood by most cultures. I wonder how today’s reporting of this incident would have gone had the ‘gunman’s’ name been Mohammed. I wonder if the term ‘gunman’s would even have been used?!

I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it:

Steve Scalise shooting: The moment baseball gunman opens fire – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40277826